Quantity v Quality

I've had a long and distinguished punting career to date - approaching my ten year anniversary imminently. The overwhelming majority of my punts have ranged between £100~£120 for 1h - even less in the last few years.

I have quite a healthy disposable income but I punt frequently and tend to lean more towards quantity over quality. That's not to say I am unsatisified with the escorts I see, but they tend to be "average girl next door types" in the eyes of many. I sometimes see reviews on sites of agency girls at £300+ per hour and ask myself if i'm missing out anything. Sure, they might look a little more refined but for a very vanilla punter like me, i'm more than happy with LFK, OWO, RO and one round of sex in 2 to 3 positions - so feel like I wouldn't neccesarily extract value from an "elite" escort.

What are the general thoughts on this topic?

I think that everyone's definition of "quality" is different

As has been said. Quality is just as subjective as pricing.

Just this, my version of quality will be completely different to lots of others, personally I regularly find quality for under £150 an hour.

I am similar to the OP, fairly healthy punting funds but I try not to waste it. My problem is I find half hour punts not long enough to do everything I like to do So I am usually looking at 120ph.

But in recent years, I have generally gone for a law of averages. If I see a wg for 120, I may see the next for half hour 80. If I have to spend more, I may skip a punt opportunity to bring my average cost down.

Bottom line, there are certain SPs I want to see despite cost. To make this work, I follow up with a few cheapies.

Works for me.

quality over quantity for me, wasnt always the case but is now.

would you ?

www.adultseek.com/ellenkb
www.adultseek.com/AbbeyExclusive
www.adultseek.com/PrincessSparkle
www.adultseek.com/Amie

wow! no way any muff is worth £300- £600 an hour

cant imagine paying that much ever

You can get quality escorts for under £150 p/h and I agree with Vlad thay £300 plus is way over priced and doesnt necessarily equate to quality.

Quality is about offering a professional service, not about price.

"agency girls at £300+ per hour"

No frigging way !😲

I feel there is wisdom in the phrase "suspiciously cheap" and correspondingly in "reassuringly expensive".

I used to look for the 100 an hour servers but both times I got more of a clinical experience when I wanted more of a seduction experience. Maybe I was spoiled by my first escort experience at 150 but my range would be 120-150.

I would do 100-120 with glowing reviews but this price range to me, while not suspiciously cheap is inauspiciously cheap.

150 is my upper limit because I have had a brilliant time at this price and I don't want to encourage anyone to go above this (for an hour sans extras). I know a girl's gotta eat but so do I. The precedent has been set.

NB it may indeed vary by region and the inflation lately may make me consider going up to 160 but no more!

I gauge quaility as being a combination of their profile, their reviews, there contribution in the forums and finally upon meeting, the service provided.

I'll go with this

I would concur, but some may not.

nor can I, not a chance

sums it up for me

no kidding

Quality is defo what we look for.